Don't get me wrong I'm not saying women can not be presidents. What I'm saying is women should not be made presidents just because of the fact that they are women. They should be considered for leadership positions because just like their male counterparts, they are capable and qualified for the job.
@phAnt0m DrAcON softspokeness doesn't run a country. The Brazilian, Argentinian, Liberian presidents all have scandals and crises to deal with and they handle them no different from their male equivalents. In fact they rule like men. If you'd be honest, most of the great women leaders in history like Yaa Asantewaa, Margaret Thatcher etc had more masculine competitiveness and decisiveness which where key values for their success.
In any case, this issue should focus, not on men versus women, but on organizational culture. At that level, a mixture of feminine and masculine traits are required. women are believed to have traits the make good at fostering relationship, collaborations and nurturing talent whiles men are competitive and aggressive. Having female traits is good but making feminine relational skills so central to leadership overlooks the aggressiveness of leadership. To succeed in this context, people need to be competitive, to have a drive to win.